This study contains data from the full securities trading and post-trading value chain for 2006 (as well as 2008 for trading venues, Central Counterparty clearing houses (CCPs) and Central Securities Depositories (CSDs)). It accordingly provides a detailed understanding of end-to-end trading and post-trading prices and costs in a number of European financial centres.
The study's findings are built on data provided by intermediaries (fund managers, brokers and custodian banks) and providers of infrastructure services (trading venues, central counterparty clearing houses and central securities depositories). The study is accordingly important for intermediaries and infrastructures as well , as illustrated by the reactions to the report set out in the annex below.
Main findings
The purpose is not to compare financial centres, but to see how prices, costs and volumes in a given centre evolve over time. Building on the diverse picture of the financial centres covered in this study, the following general findings can be made:
* Volume determines prices: As regards the data from the full value chain covering 2006, which will form the base for future monitoring, evidence from throughout the value chain highlights that volume is the single most important determinant of unit price. While there is significant cross-border activity, domestic activity is much larger. For example, while most infrastructures have many clients from abroad, these stand for much less volume than domestic clients. Therefore, throughout the value chain, the costs of trade and post-trade services are higher for cross-border transactions than domestic ones. Different potential to exploit scale economies explain much of the difference, but barriers (e.g. of Giovannini kind) certainly play a role as well.
* Cost s are decreasing: As regards the data from providers of infrastructure services, which covers both 2006 and 2008, building on the diverse picture of infrastructures in 18 financial centres, the following general observations can be made. First, across financial centres, trading costs in terms of costs per transaction have decreased significantly since 2006. Second, CCP clearing cost per transaction has decreased significantly since 2006. The picture is more diverse for CSDs. In some centres, costs have decreased while in other centres they have increased. Overall, these general trends documented by the study confirm the anecdotal evidence documented in the Commission services reports to the ECOFIN since the entry into force of the Code of Conduct.
Background
This study is the result of the first data collection exercise. It collect s data for 2006, thereby establishing the baseline against which future prices, costs and volumes will be compared. In addition, the study also contains data for 2008 as regards providers of infrastructure services (exchanges, CCPs and CSDs). This study accordingly establishes the baseline as well as providing a first illustration of how certain trade and post-trade prices have evolved.